UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

American National Bankshares Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(5)

Total fee paid:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(3)

Filing Party:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(4)

Date Filed:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

628 Main Street, Danville, Virginia, 24541

Notice of Annual Meeting

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

May ~~19, 2009~~18, 2010

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

American National Bankshares Inc.

Danville, Virginia 24541

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To be held May ~~19, 2009~~18, 2010

Place: The Wednesday Club

Danville, Virginia 24541

Date: May ~~19, 2009~~18, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.

The Annual Meeting is being held for the following purposes:

1.	To elect ~~four~~three Class III directors of the ~~Corporation~~Company to serve three-year terms expiring at the ~~2012~~2013 Annual Meeting.

2.	To elect one Class ~~II director of the Corporation to serve a one-year term expiring at the 2010 Annual Meeting.~~

3.	~~To elect one Class~~ III director of the ~~Corporation~~Company to serve a ~~two-year~~one-year term expiring at the 2011 Annual Meeting.

4.3.

To ~~consider a shareholder proposal regarding declassification~~approve an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the ~~Board~~Company to increase the number of ~~Directors that may be presented at~~authorized shares of common stock from 10,000,000 to 20,000,000 and to increase the ~~Annual Meeting.~~number of authorized shares of preferred stock from 200,000 to 2,000,000.

5.4.	To transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

It is important that your shares are represented at the meeting. Accordingly, please sign, date, and mail the enclosed proxy in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, whether or not you plan to attend. If you do attend the Annual Meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote your shares in person.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

~~Carolyn H. Compton~~

~~Assistant~~ William W. Traynham

April ~~15, 2009~~12, 2010

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

AMERICAN National Bankshares Inc.

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

MAY ~~19, 2009~~18, 2010

Voting Rights of Shareholders

Revocation and Voting of Proxies

Solicitation of Proxies

PROPOSALS ONE ~~TWO~~ AND ~~THREE~~TWO – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Name	Principal Occupation	Age	Director Since
Nominees for election as Class II directors to continue in office until 2013
Fred A. Blair	President of Blair Construction, Inc. (general contractor), Gretna, VA. Mr. Blair brings experience as a small business owner, including his knowledge of and experience in commercial construction and development in the Company’s market areas.	63	1992

Frank C. Crist, Jr., D.D.S	President of Brady & Crist Dentist, Inc Lynchburg, VA.	64	2006
	Dr. Crist brings knowledge about the Lynchburg market area where he has built a successful dental practice, as well as investments in other businesses and real properties in the area. He also brings his prior experience as a director and, ultimately, Chairman of the board of directors of a community bank.

Name	Principal Occupation	Age	Director Since

Claude B. Owen, Jr.	Retired Chairman and CEO of DIMON Incorporated (leaf tobacco dealer), Danville, VA. Mr. Owen brings broad experience in the management and oversight of public companies, including past service as Chairman and CEO of a publicly traded leaf tobacco dealer and as Chairman of a publicly traded grocery wholesaler. He also has significant experience in finance, strategic planning and corporate governance, which provides the Board with a substantial resource.	64	1984
Nominee for election as a Class III director to continue in office until 2011
E. Budge Kent, Jr. (1)	Retired as Senior Adviser to the Bank, serving from January 2006 to April 2008. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President of the Company and Executive Vice President and Chief Trust and Investment Officer of the Bank. Mr. Kent brings experience obtained over a career with the Company and Bank, with broad expertise and experience in investments, trust business development, and risk management, major areas of the Bank’s operations.	70	1979

Name

Principal Occupation

Age
Director
Since
Nominees for election as Class I directors to continue in office until 2012

Ben J. Davenport, Jr. Chairman, First Piedmont Corporation (waste management), Chatham, VA. Chairman, Davenport Energy Inc. (petroleum distribution), Chatham, VA. 66 1992

Michael P. Haley Adviser to Fenway Partners, Inc. (private equity investments), New York, NY, since April 2006. Executive Chairman, Coach America (surface transportation), Dallas, TX, since September 2007.  Retired Chairman, MW Manufacturers, Inc. (window manufacturer), Rocky Mount, VA, since June 2005; prior thereto, Chairman from January 2005 to June 2005; President and Chief Executive Officer from June 2001 to January 2005. 58 2002

Charles S. Harris Vice President for Student Services, Averett University, Danville, VA, since June 2007; Director of Athletics from May 2004 to May 2007.  Partner, Excel Development Systems, Inc. (consulting firm), Greensboro, NC, since 1987. 58 2008

Franklin W. Maddux, M.D. Chief Medical Officer, Specialty Care Services Group (healthcare services), Nashville, TN, since July 2006.  President and Chairman, Maddux Consulting, Inc. (medical consulting), since September 2005.  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Gamewood, Inc. (information technology service), Danville, VA.  President and Chairman, Danville Urologic Clinic from 1995 to 2005. 51 2002

Nominee for election as a Class II director to continue in office until 2010

E. Budge Kent, Jr. * Retired as Senior Adviser to the Bank, serving from January 2006 to April 2008. Prior thereto, Executive Vice President of the Corporation and Executive Vice President and Chief Trust and Investment Officer of the Bank. 69 1979

Nominee for election as a Class III director to continue in office until 2011

Martha W. Medley Partner of Daniel, Medley & Kirby, P.C. (attorneys at law), Danville and Martinsville, VA. 52 2008

Directors of Class I to continue in office until 2012
Ben J. Davenport, Jr.	Chairman, First Piedmont Corporation (waste management), Chatham, VA. Chairman, Davenport Energy Inc. (petroleum distribution), Chatham, VA. Mr. Davenport brings his broad experience and perspective as an entrepreneur, owning and operating several highly successful businesses within the Company’s market area. Having chaired the board of a major state university and the state chamber of commerce, he also brings strong experience in public policy.	67	1992

Name

Principal Occupation

Age
Director
Since
Directors of Class II to continue in office until 2010

Fred A. Blair President of Blair Construction, Inc. (general contractor), Gretna, VA. 62 1992

Frank C. Crist, Jr., D.D.S. President of Brady & Crist Dentists, Inc., Lynchburg, VA. 63 2006

Fred B. Leggett, Jr. Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Leggett Stores (retail), Danville, VA. 71 1994

Claude B. Owen, Jr. Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of DIMON Incorporated (leaf tobacco dealer), Danville, VA. 63 1984

Directors of Class III to continue in office until 2011

H. Dan Davis Retired Executive Vice President of the Corporation and Senior Vice President of the Bank. 71 1996

Lester A. Hudson, Jr., Ph.D. Professor and Wayland H. Cato Chair of Leadership, McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte, Charlotte, NC. 69 1984

Charles H. Majors * President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and the Bank. 63 1981

Name	Principal Occupation	Age	Director Since

Michael P. Haley	Adviser to Fenway Partners, Inc. (private equity investments), New York, NY, since April 2006. Executive Chairman, Coach America (surface transportation), Dallas, TX, since September 2007. Retired Chairman, MW Manufacturers, Inc. (window manufacturer), Rocky Mount, VA, since June 2005; prior thereto, Chairman from January 2005 to June 2005, and President and Chief Executive Officer from June 2001 to January 2005. Mr. Haley brings high level financial expertise as a former CEO of a publicly traded manufacturing company and as a current adviser to a private equity firm. He also brings experience in operations and risk management and public company corporate governance. His background helps him fill the role of financial expert on the Company’s Audit and Compliance Committee.	59	2002

Charles S. Harris	Executive Vice President, Averett University, Danville, VA, since August 2009; Vice President for Student Services, from June 2007 to July 2009; Director of Athletics from May 2004 to May 2007. Partner, Excel Development Systems, Inc. (consulting firm), Greensboro, NC, since 1987. Mr. Harris brings significant operational and financial management experience, including as the Director of Athletics for several universities of various sizes, both public and private. He brings diversity and a different perspective from his work with college students, the future customers for the Bank.	59	2008

Name	Principal Occupation	Age	Director Since

Franklin W. Maddux, M.D.	Senior Vice President, Chief Medical Information Officer, Fresenius Medical Care North America, Waltham, MA, since November 2009. Founder and Chief Medical Officer, Specialty Care Services Group (healthcare services), Nashville, TN, from July 2006 to November 2009. President and Chairman, Maddux Consulting, Inc. (medical consulting), Danville, VA, since September 2005. Chairman, Gamewood, Inc. (information technology service), Danville, VA, since 1991. President and Chairman, Danville Urologic Clinic from 1995 to 2005. Dr. Maddux has significant and varied experience as a practicing physician, the chief executive of a medical clinic, the founder of an internet service provider and a health information technology company. He brings an entrepreneurial perspective, as well as risk management and strategic planning experience.	52	2002
Directors of Class III to continue in office until 2011
H. Dan Davis	Retired Executive Vice President of the Company and Senior Vice President of the Bank. Mr. Davis brings considerable experience in the financial services industry including serving as CEO of a savings bank in the Company’s market areas. He brings operational risk management and financial accounting knowledge.	72	1996

Lester A. Hudson, Jr., Ph.D.	Professor and Wayland H. Cato Chair of Leadership, McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte, Charlotte, NC. Dr. Hudson brings broad experience as a chief executive of public and private companies, business school professor and lead director of a major public utility. He also brings significant teaching expertise in the areas of management, leadership, and strategic planning.	70	1984

Name	Principal Occupation	Age	Director Since

Charles H. Majors (1)	President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. Mr. Majors brings his long tenure and experience as the CEO of the Company. His prior experience as a practicing corporate attorney provides significant expertise in risk management, regulatory, and legal issues.	64	1981

Martha W. Medley	Partner of Daniel, Medley & Kirby, P.C. (attorneys at law), Danville and Martinsville, VA. Mrs. Medley brings her legal expertise to the issues facing the Company, especially in the areas of risk management and trust and estates. She also brings experience in non-profit organizations in the Company’s market areas, as well as a woman’s perspective to the Board.	53	2008

____________________

(1) Indicates those directors not considered to be independent.

Executive Officers

The information on the Company’s executive officers, who are not directors, is disclosed in Part I, Item 1, of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was mailed with this proxy statement.

Board Independence

The ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Board of Directors has determined that, except for Mr. Majors and Mr. Kent, each director is independent within the director independence standard of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”), as currently in effect, and within the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s director independence standards, as established and monitored by the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

Board Members Serving on Other Publicly Traded Company Boards of Directors

Certain of the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s directors are also directors of other publicly traded companies. Mr. Hudson has been a director of American Electric Power Company, Inc. since 1987. Mr. ~~Michael P.~~ Haley has been a director of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. since 2003, and LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. since 2005. Mr. Haley has also served as a director of Ply Gem Holdings, Inc. since 2006. Mr. Davenport was a director of Intertape Polymer Group Inc. from 1994 until 2005.

Board of Directors and Committees

Directors are expected to devote sufficient time, energy, and attention to ensure diligent performance of their duties, including attendance at board, committee, and shareholder meetings. The Board of Directors of the ~~Corporation~~Company met ~~eight~~five times during ~~2008.~~2009. In accordance with the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the independent directors held ~~five~~four executive sessions during ~~2008.~~2009. The Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee presides at such sessions. The Board of Directors of the Bank, which consists of all members of the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Board, met ~~thirteen~~eleven times during ~~2008.~~2009.

All incumbent directors and director nominees attended ~~more than~~at least 75% of the aggregate total number of meetings of the boards of directors and committees on which they served in ~~2008. Seven~~2009. Twelve directors attended the ~~2008~~2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The ~~boards~~Boards of ~~directors~~Directors of the ~~Corporation~~Company and the Bank have established various committees, including the Audit and Compliance Committee, the Operational Risk and Security Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. Membership and other information on these committees isare detailed below.

The Audit and Compliance Committee met four times in ~~2008.~~2009. This Committee currently consists of Messrs. Blair, Maddux, and Haley. ~~Mr. Blair~~Dr. Maddux serves as the Chairman. The Committee reviews significant audit, accounting and compliance principles, policies and ~~practices,~~practices; is directly responsible for engaging and monitoring the independent auditors of the ~~Corporation,~~Company; and provides oversight of the internal auditing and compliance functions. A more detailed description of the functions of this Committee is contained under the heading “Report of the Audit and Compliance Committee.” All of the members of this Committee are considered independent within the meaning of Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations, the listing standards of NASDAQ, and the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. Mr. Haley, a member of the Committee, is qualified as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of SEC regulations and the Board has determined that he has accounting and related financial management expertise within the meaning of the listing standards of NASDAQ.

The Operational Risk and Security Committee met one time in 2009. This Committee currently consists of Messrs. Davis, Blair, and Harris. Mr. Davis serves as the Chairman. The Committee reviews significant operational risk and security related matters, previously under the purview of the Audit and Compliance Committee. These risks include, but are not limited to, information security, fraud, physical security, insurance, and vendor management. In effect, this Committee focuses on operational and physical risk and the Audit and Compliance Committee focuses on financial and regulatory risk. This Committee was formed after the 2009 Annual Shareholders Meeting and it is expected the Committee will meet at le ast twice per year.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met four times in ~~2008.~~2009. Current members of the Committee are Messrs. Crist, Maddux, and Owen. Mr. Owen serves as the Chairman. The Committee is responsible for developing and implementing policies and practices relating to corporate governance, including reviewing and monitoring implementation of the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. In addition, the Committee develops and reviews background information on candidates for the Board and makes recommendations to the ~~Board~~B oard regarding such candidates. The Committee also supervises the Board’s annual review of director independence and oversees the Board’s performance self-evaluation. The Committee also reviews and approves the travel related expenses of the Chief Executive Officer. All the members of this Committee are considered independent within the meaning of SEC regulations, the listing standards of NASDAQ, and the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee met ~~three~~five times in ~~2008.~~2009. The Committee currently consists of Messrs. Davenport, ~~Davis,~~Haley, and Hudson. ~~Mr.~~Dr. Hudson serves as the Chairman. This Committee is responsible for establishing and approving the compensation of executive officers of the ~~Corporation,~~Company, except for the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. The compensation of the Chief Executive Officer is reviewed, discussed, and approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Committee. The Committee also makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding promotions, director compensation, and related personnel matters. ~~Refer~~ 60;Reference is made to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement for further information on the duties and responsibilities of this Committee. No member of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee ~~of the Board of Directors~~ is a current officer or employee of the ~~Corporation.~~Company. All members of this Committee are considered independent within the meaning of SEC regulations, the standards of NASDAQ, and the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

The charters of the ~~Audit and Compliance Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee~~Board Committees are available on the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s website, ~~www.amnb.com.~~www.amnb.com. For access to the charters, select the “American National Bankshares Investor Relations” icon, then select “Governance Documents.”

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee or executive officer of the ~~Corporation~~Company has a relationship that would constitute an interlocking relationship with executive officers or directors of another entity.

Director Nominations Process

The ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Board of Directors has adopted, as a component of its Corporate Governance Guidelines, a process related to director nominations (the “Nominations Process”). The purpose of the Nominations Process is to describe the manner by which candidates for possible inclusion in the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s recommended slate of director nominees are selected. The Nominations Process is administered by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board.

The Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by its members, other Board members, management, and shareholders. A shareholder who wishes to recommend a prospective nominee for the Board may, at any time, notify the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer or any member of the Committee in writing with supporting material the shareholder considers appropriate. The Committee will decide whether to recommend to the Board the nomination of any person recommended by a shareholder pursuant to the provisions of the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s bylaws relating to shareholder proposals, as described in the “Shareholder Communications and Proposals” section of this proxy statement.

Once the Committee has identified a candidate, it makes an initial determination ~~as to~~ whether to conduct a full evaluation of the ~~candidate. The initial determination is~~candidate based on information accompanying the recommendation ~~as well as~~and the Committee members’ knowledge of the candidate, which may be supplemented by inquiries to the person making such recommendation or to others. The preliminary determination is based primarily on the need for additional Board members to fill vacancies or expand the size of the Board and the likelihood that the candidate can satisfy the evaluation factors established in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Committee may seek additional information about the candidate’s background and experience. The Committee then evaluates the candidate against the criteria in the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, including, but not limited to, independence, ~~age, diversity,~~ availability for time commitment, skills such as an understanding of the financial services industry, general business knowledge and experience, all in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at that point in time. The Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity on the Board. However, it considers diversity as a prerequisite for adequately representing the interests of the various stakeholders in the Company – shareholders, customers, and employees. The Committee seeks diversity in overall board composition. In the Committee's nominee considerations, diversity is a much broader concept than just the traditional racial and gender dimensions, as it also includes education, geography, business and professional experience and expertise, and civic involvement and responsibility, especially within the Company’s market area. In connection with this ~~evaluation,~~evaluati on process, the Committee determines whether to interview the candidate, and if warranted, one or more members of the Committee will conduct such interview. After completing the evaluation, the Committee makes a recommendation to the Board of Directors as to the persons who should be nominated by the Board, and the Board determines the nominees after considering the recommendation of the Committee.

Corporate Governance and Risk Oversight Practices

~~As noted above under “Proposals One, Two and Three – Election of Directors” and pursuant to~~In a financial institution, the ~~Corporation's bylaws, the Board of Directors elected Charles S. Harris and Martha W. Medley in November 2008 to serve as members~~role of the Board ~~until~~is critical to the ~~Annual Meeting in May 2009.~~success or failure of the enterprise. The Board of the Company is led by its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Mr. ~~Harris is a nominee for election at~~Majors, who functions as the ~~Annual Meeting in May 2009 as a director for a three-year term as a member~~de facto Chairman of ~~Class I and Ms. Medley is a nominee for election at~~ the ~~Annual Meeting in May 2009 as a director for a two-year term as a member of Class III.~~Board. The ~~Nominations Process outlined above was used to identify and select these new directors. Both were identified as prospective candidates by members~~Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, Mr. Owen, functions as the lead independent director. He chairs the Board in the absence of the CEO or when the Board’s independent directors meet in executive session without the CEO. Mr. Owen is a retired Chairman and CEO of a publicly traded tobacco company, and a former non-executive board chairman of another public company, and his background and experience prepares him well for this role. Meetings of the independent directors are held numerous times throughout t he year.

This structure has evolved over the past 16 years, during the tenure of Mr. Majors as CEO. In the opinion of the Board, it has served the interests of the shareholders, customers, employees and regulators well, as vouched by the Company’s consistently higher than peer average asset quality, earnings, and total return to shareholders.

The Board of Directors of a financial institution is the strategic linchpin in the risk oversight process. Financial institutions deal with credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk, reputation risk, and regulatory risk in the day to day conduct of business. In order to better manage the risk oversight process, in 2009 the Board created a new Operational Risk and Security Committee, which assumed some of the oversight duties previously addressed by the Audit and Compliance Committee. ~~The~~In effect, the Board has one committee to address the financial and regulatory related risks, the Audit and Compliance Committee, ~~believes~~and a second committee to address the physical and operational risks, the new Operational Risk and Security Committee. Both committees receive information frequently from the C EO, Chief Financial Officer, internal auditor, compliance officer, other key officers, external auditors, and regulators. In the opinion of the Board, this structure provides for an improved approach to risk oversight.

Corporate governance is, or should be, a constantly evolving and improving process. Companies have to be prepared to adjust to changing circumstances and react appropriately. During 2009, Mr. Majors and the Board began planning for his retirement on an orderly schedule. In December 2009, the Board engaged an outside firm to assist in the succession planning process ~~is effective~~ and ~~resulted in~~ the selection of a successor. This process is being directed by a Board committee of independent directors, but the final selection of the new ~~directors~~Chief Executive Officer will be determined by the Board. This will be a thorough selection process, which the Board anticipates will be concluded sometime in 2010. The new officer will work directly with Mr. Majors for some period of time, as Mr. Majors disengages slowly from the ~~requisite experience, knowledge~~daily aspects of running the Company and ~~diversity.~~the Bank. At the appropriate time, Mr. Majors will transition to the role of Board Chairman, as the new officer assumes more responsibility. This strategy should make for a smooth and effective transition.

Board Tenure Policy

The Board of the Company has a long-standing policy for the Company and the Bank with respect to the tenure of directors. In summary, it provides for the following:

ü	No director will allow himself to be nominated for reelection to the Board of the Company after reaching the age of 72;

ü	No director will allow himself to be nominated for reelection to the board of the Bank, unless at the time of such reelection he was eligible to serve as a director of the Company;

ü	Any director who retires or resigns from or severs his current employment, or relocates outside the market area of the Bank, will tender his resignation. The Board may accept it, delay acceptance, or decline to accept it;

ü	No inside director will continue to serve as a director after his retirement, resignation or other severance of employment status. However, the Board may waive this requirement if it is deemed in the best interests of the Company or the Bank;

ü	No director will be eligible for reelection if he is absent from all meetings for the 12 month period preceding the Annual Meeting of Shareholders at which such election would be held;

Any former director may be elected as a Director Emeritus for a one year term, but may not serve more than three years or after reaching age 75. A Director Emeritus will be entitled to attend and participate in Board meetings, but will not be eligible to vote and his presence will not be considered in the determination of a quorum.

During 2009, Dr. Maddux changed his employment status and tendered his resignation in compliance with the above policy, which was declined by the Board. Also, during that period, the Board approved Mr. Kent’s continued service as an inside director. Mr. Leggett, having reached the age of 72, did not allow his name to be placed in nomination for reelection at the 2010 Annual Meeting. The Company’s Governance and Nominating Committee will be recommending to the full Board that Mr. Leggett be elected a Director Emeritus at the Organizational Meeting subsequent to the next Annual Meeting.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP

~~As of April 3, 2009, no shareholder beneficially owned 5% or more~~The table below includes all shareholders of the ~~Corporation’s~~Company known to management to beneficially own more than 5 percent of the Company’s common stock other than Ambro and Company, the nominee name that American National Bank and Trust Company uses to register the securities it holds in a fiduciary capacity for customers. Ambro and Company beneficially owned 629,425 shares of the Corporation’s common stock, or 10.35% of the outstanding shares, as of ~~April 3,~~December 31, 2009. Of this amount, 182,108 shares may be voted by existing co-fiduciaries. The Bank may not vote the remaining shares, but co-fiduciaries may be qualified for the sole purpose of voting all or a portion of these remaining shares at the Annual Meeting. The address of Ambro and Company is P.O. Box 191, Danville, Virginia 24543.

Name and Address of	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned	Investment Power			Voting Power			Percent of Class
Beneficial Owner	(#) (1)	Shares	Sole	None	Shares	Sole	None	(%)

BlackRock, Inc.	316,785	-	316,785	-	-	316,785	-	5.18	%
40 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10022 (2)

Ambro and Company	515,448	515,448	-	-	193,286	-	-	8.43	%
P.O. Box 191
Danville, Virginia 24543 (3)

____________________

(1)

For purposes of this table, beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the provisions of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 under which, in general, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if he has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting of the security or the power to dispose of or direct the disposition of the security, or if he has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of the security within 60 days.

(2)	This ownership position is related to BlackRock’s acquisition of Barclay’s Global Investors and certain of its affiliates. This information is based upon information as of December 31, 2009 contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 29, 2010.

(3)

Ambro and Company is the nominee name that American National Bank and Trust Company uses to register the securities it holds in a fiduciary capacity for customers. The Bank may not vote the remaining shares, but co-fiduciaries may be qualified for the sole purpose of voting all or a portion of these remaining shares at the Annual Meeting.

The following table sets forth, as of ~~April 3, 2009,~~March 11, 2010, the beneficial ownership of the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s common stock by all directors and nominees for director, all executive officers of the ~~Corporation~~Company named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 1419 of this proxy statement, and all directors and executive officers of the ~~Corporation~~Company as a group.

Name of Beneficial Owner		Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1) (#)			Percent of Class (%)		Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1) (#)

Fred A. Blair		5,764	(2)		*		5,976	(2)			*
Frank C. Crist, Jr., D.D.S.		82,709	(2)		1.36		85,684	(2)			1.40
Ben J. Davenport, Jr.		30,439			*		31,653				*
H. Dan Davis		129,514	(2)		2.13		129,514	(2)			2.12
R. Helm Dobbins		17,200	(3)		*		19,637		(3)	(4)	*
S. Cabell Dudley		1,700	(3)		*
S. Cabell Dudley, Jr.							4,192		(3)	(4)	*
Dabney T.P. Gilliam, Jr.		1,750	(3)		*		4,195		(3)	(4)	*
Jeffrey V. Haley		31,360	(2)	(3)	*		34,129	(2)	(3)	(4)	*
Michael P. Haley		5,522			*		5,708				*
Charles S. Harris		100			*		250				*
Lester A. Hudson, Jr., Ph.D.		9,804			*		9,987				*
E. Budge Kent, Jr.		52,893	(2)	(3)	*		50,808	(2)	(3)		*
Fred B. Leggett, Jr.		10,209	(2)		*		10,241	(2)			*
Franklin W. Maddux, M.D.		2,400	(2)		*		1,983				*
Charles H. Majors		111,424	(2)	(3)	1.81		108,765	(2)	(3)	(4)	1.76
Martha W. Medley		100			*		100				*
Claude B. Owen, Jr.		15,632	(2)		*		15,815	(2)			*
Neal A. Petrovich		3,800	(3)		*
William W. Traynham							4,937			(4)	*
All directors and executive officers as a group (18)	All directors and executive officers as a group (18)	512,320			8.26	All directors and executive officers as a group (18)	523,574				8.40

____________________

Represents less than 1% ownership.

(1)

(2)

Includes shares held by affiliated ~~corporations,~~companies, close relatives, minor children, and shares held jointly with spouses or as custodians or trustees, as follows: Mr. Blair, ~~308~~159 shares; Dr. Crist, ~~581~~600 shares; Mr. Davis, 40,704 shares; Mr. Jeffrey V. Haley, ~~651~~724 shares; Mr. Kent, ~~1,709~~1,767 shares; Mr. Leggett, 9,268 ~~shares; Dr. Maddux, 1,100~~ shares; Mr. Majors, 3,744 shares; and Mr. Owen, 4,200 shares.

(3)

Includes shares that may be acquired pursuant to currently exercisable stock options: Mr. Dobbins, ~~15,500~~17,000 shares; Mr. Dudley, ~~1,500;~~3,000 shares; Mr. Gilliam, ~~1,500;~~3,000 shares; Mr. Jeffrey V. Haley, ~~18,500~~20,000 shares; Mr. Kent, ~~12,000;~~9,000 shares; Mr. Majors, ~~69,000 shares; Mr. Petrovich, 1,500~~55,000 shares; all directors and executive officers as a group, ~~119,500~~107,000 shares.

(4)

Includes shares of restricted stock awarded in January 2010: Mr. Dobbins, 937 shares; Mr. Dudley, 937 shares; Mr. Gilliam, 937 shares; Mr. Jeffrey V. Haley, 937 shares; Mr. Majors, 2,341 shares, Mr. Traynham, 937 shares; all executive officers as a group, 7,026 shares.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors has reviewed and discussed with management the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based upon this review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s definitive ~~Proxy Statement~~proxy statement on Schedule 14A for its ~~2009~~2010 Annual Meeting, which is incorporated by reference in the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Respectfully submitted,

Lester A. Hudson, Jr., Ph.D., Chairman

Ben J. Davenport, Jr.

~~H. Dan Davis~~Michael P. Haley

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Executive Compensation Philosophy

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and approving the compensation of the executive officers of the ~~Corporation,~~Company, except for the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, which is approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors. The Committee considers a variety of factors and criteria in arriving at its decisions and recommendations for compensation. The Committee’s objective is to attract and retain qualified executive officers and to align their interests with those of the ~~Corporation~~Company and its shareholders. Accordingly, a portion of the executive compensation program is designed to motivate and reward achievements that make a positive impact on the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s profitability and total shareholder return.

Each director who served on the Committee during ~~2008~~2009 qualifies as a “non-employee director” as such term is defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is an “independent director” as such term is defined in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule ~~4200(a)(15)~~5605(a)(2).

The base salary of each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table (the “named executive officers”) is designed to be competitive with that of the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s peer banks and bank holding companies. In establishing the base salaries for the named executive officers, the Committee relies upon an evaluation of each officer’s level of responsibility and performance and on comparative information, including the Virginia Bankers Association’s Salary Survey of Virginia Banks and the SNL Bank Compensation Review. In establishing base salaries for named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee also receives and takes into account the individual compensation recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer. The independent directors ~~collectively~~collective ly evaluate the performance of the Chief Executive Officer in executive session. Subsequently, the Chairman of the Committee meets individually with the Chief Executive Officer to review the results of the evaluation. The salary of the Chief Executive Officer is reviewed, discussed, and approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors in executive session, upon recommendation of the Committee.

Profit Sharing and Incentive Compensation Programs

Stock Compensation Plans

The ~~Corporation~~Company maintains the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (“2008 Plan”), which is designed to attract and retain qualified ~~personnel in~~ key ~~positions,~~personnel, provide employees with a proprietary interest in the ~~Corporation~~Company as an incentive to contribute to the success of the ~~Corporation,~~Company, and reward employees for outstanding performance and the attainment of targeted goals. The 2008 Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors of the ~~Corporation~~Company on February 19, 2008 and approved by the shareholders on April 22, 2008 at the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s 2008 Annual Meeting. The 2008 Plan provides for the granting of restricted stock awards and incentive and non-statutory options to employees and directors on a periodic basis, at the discretion of the Board or a Board designated committee. The 2008 Plan authorized the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of common stock. The 2008 Plan replaced the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s stock option plan that was approved by the shareholders at the 1997 Annual Meeting, which plan terminated in 2006 (the “1997 Option Plan”).

The 2008 Plan is administered by a Committee of the Board of Directors of the ~~Corporation~~Company comprised of independent directors. Under the 2008 Plan, the Committee determines which employees will be granted restricted stock awards and options, whether such options will be incentive or ~~non-statutory~~non-statutory options, the number of shares subject to each option, whether such options may be exercised by delivering other shares of common stock, and when such options become exercisable. In general, the per share exercise price of an incentive stock option must be at least equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date the option is granted. Restricted stock ~~would be~~is granted under terms and conditions established by the Committee.

Stock options become vested and exercisable in the manner specified by the Committee. Each stock option or portion thereof shall be exercisable at any time on or after it vests and is exercisable until ten years after its date of grant. As of December 31, ~~2008, 159,610~~2009, 104,353 shares remain exercisable under the 1997 Option Plan and ~~14,750~~27,750 shares are exercisable under the 2008 Plan. There were ~~59,000~~6,000 stock options awarded in ~~2008.~~2009. All options granted in ~~2008~~2009 had multi-year vesting schedules to enhance employee retention.

The summary stock option plan table is included in Part II, Item 5 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Deferred Compensation

The ~~Corporation~~Bank entered into a deferred compensation agreement with Charles H. Majors, Chief Executive Officer, initially as of February 22, 1993, and most recently amended and restated as of December 31, 2008. The agreement requires an annual payment of $50,000 for a period of ten years to Mr. Majors or his designated beneficiary, commencing within three months of his termination of employment or death, whichever occurs first. The amount of this payment is fixed and the funds for this payment are not established in an account that allows for additional contributions or earnings growth. Payments under this agreement are independent of, and in addition to, those under any other plan, program, or agreement between Mr. Majors and the ~~Corporation. There~~Company or the Bank. Th ere are no deferred compensation arrangements with any of the other named executive officers.

The plan was closed to new participants at December 31, 2009. On that date, the Company converted the plan to a cash balance plan. Participants will earn each year, with some adjustments, income based on the ten year U. S. Treasury note yield established at December 31 of the prior year. The Company expects this change will reduce the on-going cost of the program.

401(k) Employee Savings Plan

Executive Severance Agreements

Each agreement also provides for the executive officer to receive continued salary and benefits if his employment is terminated “without cause” (as such term is defined in the agreement) during the term of the agreement. If employment is terminated during the first year after a control change, the Chief Executive Officer will receive continued salary and benefits for 24 months after such termination and the other executive officers will receive continued salary and benefits until the second anniversary of the change in control. If the termination of employment occurs more than 12 months after the control change, the Chief Executive Officer will receive continued salary and benefits until the third anniversary of the control change and the other executive officers will receive continued salary and ~~benefits~~benefit s until the earlier of the first anniversary of termination of employment or the third anniversary of the control change.

Potential Payments ~~Upon~~upon Termination or Change in Control

Of the named executive officers, only the Chief Executive Officer would receive payments in the event of retirement or termination unrelated to a change in control. If Mr. Majors’ employment had terminated on December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, due to a change in control or otherwise, he would receive annual payments of $50,000 for ten years under the terms of the deferred compensation agreement discussed in the “Deferred Compensation” section of this proxy statement.

If a change in control had occurred on December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, and the named executive officers were terminated on that same date, the benefits that would be payable to each of the named executive officers under the terms of their executive severance agreements are identified in the following table. ~~Mr. Petrovich resigned from the Corporation in February 2009 and is not included in this table.~~ This hypothetical scenario would require payment of salary and bonus and coverage under the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s healthcare, other insurance benefits, and pension plans through December 31, ~~2010.~~2011. The benefits payable under any other change in control termination scenario would be less than or equal to the amounts shown.

Name	Salary (24 months) $	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (24 months) $	Healthcare and Other Insurance Benefits (24 months) $	Change in Pension Value (Lump sum) $	Salary (24 months) $		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (24 months) $		Other (24 months) $		Change in Pension Value (Lump sum) $

Charles H. Majors (1)	728,000	0	19,167	165,262		728,000		-		30,775		537,778

William W. Traynham						292,000		-		11,784		-

Jeffrey V. Haley	314,496	0	12,441	39,456		314,496		-		18,215		179,718

R. Helm Dobbins	280,802	0	7,117	42,200		280,802		-		11,740		115,400

S. Cabell Dudley, Jr.	270,000	0	16,414	41,558		270,000		-		22,466		93,678

Dabney T.P. Gilliam, Jr.	254,616	0	12,510	24,658		254,616		-		18,062		118,098

~~____________________~~

____________________

(1)	~~(1)~~Excludes annual payments of $50,000 for ten years, which are payable under the terms of a deferred compensation agreement and are not exclusive to a change in control.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

The Company’s practice is to expense salary, bonus and incentive compensation, and benefit costs as they are incurred for tax and accounting purposes. Salary, bonus and incentive compensation, and some benefit payments are taxable to the recipient as ordinary income. The tax and accounting treatment of the various elements of compensation is not a major factor in the Company’s decision making with respect to executive compensation. To maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Committee has not adopted a policy requiring all compensation to be deductible.

Security Ownership Guidelines and Hedging of Securities

The Company does not have any formal security ownership guidelines for executive officers, but all of our executive officers own a number of shares with some having substantial ownership. The Committee has recently adopted a policy which requires that any grants of restricted stock to executive officers be held by the grantee as long as he is employed by the Company. The Company does not have any policies regarding our executive officers’ hedging the economic risk of ownership of our shares.

Financial Restatement

The Board of Directors does not have a policy with respect to adjusting retroactively any cash or equity based incentive compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers where payment was conditioned on achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of an award or payment, or with respect to recovery of any amount determined to have been inappropriately received by an individual executive. If such a restatement were ever to occur, the Board would expect to address such matters on a case-by-case basis in light of all of the relevant circumstances.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position

President and Chief Executive Officer

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,

Senior Vice President of the Corporation;

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary (3) ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (4) ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Charles H. Majors	2009	378,000	-	-	-	-	268,889	27,154	674,043
President and Chief Executive Officer	2008	361,846	-	-	79,600	-	82,631	21,007	545,085
of the Company and the Bank	2007	347,308	-	-	-	23,016	61,224	19,129	450,677

William W. Traynham Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	2009	116,055	-	-	27,780	-	-	9,277	153,112
of the Company; Executive Vice President and	2008 (1)
Chief Financial Officer of the Bank	2007 (1)

Jeffrey V. Haley Senior Vice President of the Company;	2009	163,296	-	-	-	-	89,859	14,006	267,161
Executive Vice President and President of Trust	2008	156,318	-	-	23,880	-	19,728	11,208	211,134
and Financial Services of the Bank	2007	149,908	-	-	-	9,935	14,381	10,926	185,150

R. Helm Dobbins Senior Vice President of the Company;	2009	145,801	-	-	-	-	57,700	10,244	213,745
Executive Vice President and Chief	2008	139,570	-	-	23,880	-	19,728	11,208	194,386
Credit Officer of the Bank	2007	133,847	-	-	-	8,870	13,099	7,909	163,725

S. Cabell Dudley, Jr. Senior Vice President of the Company;	2009	140,192	-	-	-	-	46,839	15,439	202,470
Executive Vice President and Chief	2008	127,056	-	-	23,880	-	20,779	12,211	183,926
Lending Officer of the Bank	2007 (2)

Dabney T.P. Gilliam, Jr. Senior Vice President of the Company;	2009	132,205	-	-	-	-	59,049	12,997	204,250
Executive Vice President and Chief	2008	124,544	-	-	23,880	-	12,329	10,155	170,908
Administrative Officer of the Bank	2007 (2)

____________________

(1) Mr. Traynham joined the Company in April 2009.

(2) Mr. Dudley and Mr. Gilliam were named executive officers in December 2008.

(3) Salary totals in 2009 were based on 27 biweekly pay periods instead of a typical 26 period.

(4) Since the pension plan was converted to a cash balance plan and frozen effective December 31, 2009, the assumptions used to determine

present value of accumulated benefit for each participant have been changed so that the present value of accumulated benefit shown as of the

end of the year is equal to their opening balance under the cash balance plan. This is the same amount that would have been payable under the

prior plan had the participant terminated employment and elected a lump sum payment. There were no ~~payments made under~~benefit increases for any participant

attributable to the ~~Corporation’s profit sharing and incentive compensation programs for 2008.~~cash balance plan conversion.

All other compensation includes the use of an automobile with tax gross-ups for commuting expense for the Chief Executive Officer, company contributions to the 401(k) Employee Savings Plan for all named executive officers, and company paid insurance premiums for all named executive officers. It also includes a profit sharing distribution of 1.5% of their earned income in 2009. None of these compensation items individually exceeds $10,000 and, therefore, are not identified separately.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Option Awards

Name

Grant Date

Number of Shares
Underlying Options
(#)

Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards
($/Sh)
Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards
($)
Charles H. Majors 12/16/2008 20,000 17.00 79,600
Neal A. Petrovich * 12/16/2008 6,000 17.00 23,880
Jeffrey V. Haley 12/16/2008 6,000 17.00 23,880
R. Helm Dobbins 12/16/2008 6,000 17.00 23,880
S. Cabell Dubley, Jr. 12/16/2008 6,000 17.00 23,880
Dabney T.P. Gilliam, Jr. 12/16/2008 6,000 17.00 23,880

* Mr. Petrovich resigned from the Corporation in February 2009.

	Option Awards
Name	Grant Date	Number of Shares Underlying Options (#)	Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)	Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards ($)
William W. Traynham	4/21/2009	6,000	16.00	27,780

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table reflects the outstanding stock option awards as of December 31, ~~2008~~2009 for the named executive officers.

Option Awards

Name

Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable

Option
Exercise
Price ($)

Option
Expiration
Date
Charles H. Majors 9,000 - 13.6875 04/20/2009
10,000 - 20.0000 12/21/2009
10,000 - 19.9500 03/19/2012
10,000 - 26.2000 12/16/2013
25,000 - 24.5000 12/21/2014
5,000 15,000 17.0000 12/16/2018
Neal A. Petrovich * 5,000 - 21.3800 06/15/2014
5,000 - 24.5000 12/21/2014
1,500 4,500 17.0000 12/16/2018
Jeffrey V. Haley 1,079 - 13.6875 04/20/2009
3,000 - 16.5000 03/20/2011
1,000 - 19.9500 03/19/2012
3,000 - 26.1000 12/17/2012
5,000 - 26.2000 12/16/2013
5,000 - 24.5000 12/21/2014
1,500 4,500 17.0000 12/16/2018
R. Helm Dobbins 4,000 - 24.0000 06/17/2013
5,000 - 26.2000 12/16/2013
5,000 - 24.5000 12/21/2014
1,500 4,500 17.0000 12/16/2018
S. Cabell Dudley, Jr. 1,500 4,500 17.0000 12/16/2018
Dabney T.P. Gilliam, Jr. 1,500 4,500 17.0000 12/16/2018

* Mr. Petrovich resigned from the Corporation in February 2009.

	Option Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Numbers of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date
Charles H. Majors	10,000	-	-	19.9500	03/19/2012
	10,000	-	-	26.2000	12/16/2013
	25,000	-	-	24.5000	12/21/2014
	10,000	10,000	-	17.0000	12/16/2018

William W. Traynham	2,000	4,000	-	16.0000	04/21/2019

Jeffrey V. Haley	3,000	-	-	16.5000	03/20/2011
	1,000	-	-	19.9500	03/19/2012
	3,000	-	-	26.1000	12/17/2012
	5,000	-	-	26.2000	12/16/2013
	5,000	-	-	24.5000	12/21/2014
	3,000	3,000	-	17.0000	12/16/2018

R. Helm Dobbins	4,000	-	-	24.0000	06/17/2013
	5,000	-	-	26.2000	12/16/2013
	5,000	-	-	24.5000	12/21/2014
	3,000	3,000	-	17.0000	12/16/2018

S. Cabell Dudley, Jr.	3,000	3,000	-	17.0000	12/16/2018

Dabney T.P. Gilliam, Jr.	3,000	3,000	-	17.0000	12/16/2018

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

Acquired on Exercise

~~(1)~~

~~The value realized on exercise is the difference between the option price and the closing price of the Corporation’s~~

(1) The value realized on exercise is the difference between the option price and the closing price of the Company’s

common stock on the date of exercise multiplied by the number of options exercised.

~~(2)~~

Mr. Majors exercised options on February 15, 2008 for 2,000 shares originally granted on February 17, 1998 with an exercise price of $17.1875 and for another 2,000 shares originally granted on February 17, 1998 with an exercise price of $18.75. The common stock’s closing price at the date of exercise was $21.80.

(2) Mr. Majors exercised options on April 20, 2009 for 9,000 shares originally granted on April 20, 1999 with an

exercise price of $13.6875. The common stock’s closing price at the date of exercise was $16.05.

~~(3)~~

~~Mr. Haley exercised options on September 4, 2008 for 730~~(3) Mr. Haley exercised options on March 4, 2009 for 1,079 shares originally granted on April 20, 1999 with an exercise price of $13.6875 and on December 5, 2008 for 1,461 shares originally granted on April 20, 1999 with an exercise price of $13.6875. The common stock’s closing price at the date of exercise was $17.23 on September 4, 2008 and $16.00 at December 5, 2008.

exercise price of $13.6875. The common stock’s closing price at the date of exercise was $15.56.

~~Because~~As of December 31, 2009, the ~~Corporation has never~~Company had not granted any restricted stock ~~awards to the named executive officers, the columns regarding stock awards have been omitted from the table.~~

The following table reflects the actuarial present value of the named executive officers’ accumulated benefits under the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s pension plan and the number of years of service credited under the plan as of December 31, ~~2008.~~2009.

Name	Plan Name	Number of Years Credited Service (#)	Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($)
Charles H. Majors	Pension	17	822,766
William W. Traynham (1)	Pension	-	-
Jeffrey V. Haley	Pension	13	180,755
R. Helm Dobbins	Pension	7	131,769
S. Cabell Dudley, Jr.	Pension	4	97,884
Dabney T.P. Gilliam, Jr.	Pension	9	128,646

(1) Mr. Traynham is not eligible for the pension plan.

Name

Plan Name
Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)
Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit
($)
Charles H. Majors Pension 16 553,877
Neal A. Petrovich Pension 5 30,852
Jeffrey V. Haley Pension 12 90,896
R. Helm Dobbins Pension 6 74,069
S. Cabell Dudley, Jr. Pension 3 51,045
Dabney T.P. Gilliam, Jr. Pension 8 69,597

There were no payments made from the pension plan to any of the named executive officers during ~~2008.~~2009.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table is not presented since the ~~Corporation~~Company does not offer a deferred compensation plan that requires or allows any named executive officer to make annual contributions, nor does it have a fund of monies established for any named executive officer that increases in value due to earnings on that fund.

Director Compensation

~~Non-employee~~During 2009, non-employee directors ~~receive~~received a monthly retainer of $1,000 and an attendance fee of $400 for each committee meeting and Bank board meeting attended. The Board of Directors sets the retainer and attendance fee based upon recommendation from the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. The retainer was last changed in 2007 and the attendance fee was last changed in 2000. In making its recommendation, the Committee reviews the director compensation of peer banks. Non-employee directors living outside the Danville area are reimbursed for meeting-related travel and lodging expenses. Non-employee directors ~~are~~were excluded from the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s retirement plan and, therefore, do not qualify for pension benefits. Directors who are employees of the ~~Corporation~~Company do not receive any director compensation. The following table reflects the director compensation earned or paid during ~~2008.~~2009.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total Compensation in 2008 ($)	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Total Compensation in 2009 ($)
Fred A. Blair	19,200	-	19,200	18,800	18,800
Frank C. Crist, Jr., D.D.S.	18,800	-	18,800	17,600	17,600
Ben D. Davenport, Jr.	18,800	-	18,800
Ben J. Davenport, Jr.				18,000	18,000
H. Dan Davis	19,600	-	19,600	18,000	18,000
Michael P. Haley	17,600	-	17,600	18,000	18,000
Charles S. Harris **	3,200	-	3,200
Charles S. Harris				16,800	16,800
Lester A. Hudson, Jr., Ph.D.	18,400	-	18,400	18,400	18,400
E. Budge Kent, Jr. *	14,800	35,400	50,200
E. Budge Kent, Jr. (1)				21,800	21,800
Fred B. Leggett, Jr.	20,800	-	20,800	20,800	20,800
Franklin W. Maddux, M.D.	20,000	-	20,000	19,200	19,200
Charles H. Majors	-	-	-	-	-
Martha W. Medley **	2,800	-	2,800
Martha W. Medley				19,200	19,200
Claude B. Owen, Jr.	23,200	-	23,200	22,800	22,800
Total	197,200	35,400	232,600	229,400	229,400

* Mr. E. Budge Kent, Jr., a former executive officer of the Corporation, served in the capacity of Senior Adviser until April 2008, for which he____________________

~~earned $10,000. As a result, he did not receive any compensation as a non-employee director until May 2008, receiving the monthly retainer and applicable~~

~~meeting fees thereafter.~~

Committee. He receives $200 per monthly meeting attended and received a total of ~~$400~~$1,800 in ~~2008.~~2009.

Beginning in 2006, Mr. Kent has received $25,000 annually under a deferred compensation agreement that was entered into with the ~~Corporation~~Company in June 1997. This deferred compensation agreement entitles him or his designated beneficiary to annual payments of $25,000 for ten years. The payments relate to Mr. Kent’s previous service as an employee of the Bank and not as a director of the Company and, accordingly, the amount is not reflected in the above table.

** Mr. Charles S. Harris

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

~~Certain directors and officers of the Corporation and the companies with which they are associated were customers of, and had banking transactions with, the Bank in~~

In the ordinary course of its business, the ~~Bank’s business during 2008. Other than these~~Bank makes loans to, accepts deposits from, and provides other banking ~~transactions, there were no other reportable related party transactions. All loans~~services to, certain directors and ~~commitments to lend included in such transactions were~~executive officers of the Company, their associates, and members of their immediate families. Loans are made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates, collateral and ~~collateral,~~repayment terms, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not ~~related to~~affiliated with the ~~lender~~Bank, and ~~in the opinion of the management of the Corporation,~~ do not involve more than athe normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features. ~~These~~Such loans are ~~monitored by~~processed through the Bank’s normal credit approval procedures, but ultimate approval authority rests with the Board of Directors of the Bank. Rates paid on deposits and fees charged for other banking services and other terms of these transactions, are also the same as tho se prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not affiliated with the Bank. The Bank expects to continue to enter into transactions in the ordinary course of business on similar terms with the directors, officers, principal shareholders, their associates, and members of their immediate families. Loans outstanding to such persons at December 31, 2009 and 2008 totaled $18,543,000 and $19,795,000, respectively. None of such loans have been on non-accrual status, 90 days or more past due, or restructured at any time.

From time to time the Company may also enter into other types of business transactions or arrangements for services with the Company’s directors, officers, principal shareholders or their associates. These types of transactions or services might include, among others, purchases of equipment or provision of legal services. The Company will only enter into such arrangements if it is determined that the prices or rates offered are comparable to those available to us from unaffiliated third parties. Management approves such transactions on a ~~routine~~case by case basis. The Company does not have written policies or procedures with respect to such approvals. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has no such reportable transactions.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE

The Audit and Compliance Committee assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of (1) the integrity of the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s financial statements and its financial reporting and disclosure practices, (2) the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent accountants engaged to prepare or issue an audit report on the financial statements of the ~~Corporation,~~Company, (3) the soundness of the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s systems of internal controls regarding finance and accounting compliance, (4) the independence and performance of the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s internal audit staff, and (5) compliance with significant applicable legal, ethical, and regulatory requirements. The Committee strives to provide an open avenue of communication between the Board of Directors, management, the internal auditor, the compliance officer, and the ~~independent~~indepe ndent accountants.

All of the members of this Committee are considered independent within the meaning of SEC regulations, the listing standards of NASDAQ, and the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. Additionally, each member is considered an “independent director,” as that term is defined by NASDAQ Marketplace Rule ~~4200(a)(15)~~5605(a)(2).

Mr. Michael P. Haley, a member of the Committee, is qualified as an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of SEC regulations and the Board has determined he has accounting and related financial management expertise within the meaning of the listing standards of NASDAQ.

Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit and Compliance Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, and be filed with the SEC.

The Audit and Compliance Committee pre-approves all audit, audit-related, and tax services on an annual basis, and, in addition, authorizes individual engagements that exceed pre-established thresholds. Any additional engagement that falls below the pre-established thresholds must be reported by management at the Audit and Compliance Committee meeting immediately following the initiation of such an engagement.

A copy of the Audit and Compliance Committee charter is available on the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s website, ~~www.amnb.com.~~www.amnb.com. For access to the charter, select the “American National Bankshares Inc.” icon, then select “Governance Documents.”

Respectfully submitted,

Fred A. Blair ~~Chairman~~

Franklin W. Maddux, M.D.

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Fees to Independent Auditors for Fiscal Year ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008

PROPOSAL ~~FOUR~~THREE – ~~SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL~~TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FROM 10,000,000 TO 20,000,000 AND

TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK FROM 200,000 TO 2,000,000

~~Gerald R. Armstrong,~~On February 16, 2010, the holder of 1,572 shares of the Corporation’s common stock, whose address is 910 Sixteenth Street, No. 412, Denver, Colorado, 80202-2917, and whose telephone number is 303-355-1199, has notified the Corporation that he intends to present the following resolution at the Annual Meeting. TheCompany’s Board of Directors and the Corporation accept no responsibility for the proposed resolution and supporting statement. As required by federal regulations, the resolution and supporting statement are printed below. To ensure that readers can easily distinguish between the materials provided by the proponent and the materials provided by the Corporation, we have placed a box around materials provided by the proponent.

~~SHAREHOLDER RESOLUTION~~

~~That the shareholders of AMERICAN NATIONAL BANKSHARES INC. request its Board of Directors to take the steps necessary to eliminate classification of terms of its Board of Directors to require that~~ ~~all~~ ~~Directors stand for election annually. The Board declassification shall be completed in a manner that does not affect the unexpired terms of the previously-elected Directors.~~

~~STATEMENT~~

The proponent believes the election of directors is the strongest way that shareholders influence the directors of any corporation. Currently, our board of directors is divided into three classes with each class serving three-year terms. Because of this structure, shareholders may only vote for one-third of the directors each year. This is not in the best interest of shareholders because it reduces accountability.

Excel Energy Inc., Devon Energy Corporation, ConocoPhillips, ONEOK, Inc., CenterPoint Energy, Inc., and Hess Corporation have adopted this practice and it has been approved by shareholders at CH Energy Group, Inc., Central Vermont Public Services Corporation, Black Hills Corporation, Spectra Energy Corp., and several others, upon presentation of a similar resolution by the proponent during 2008. The proponent is a professional investor who has studied this issue carefully.

The performance of our management and our Board of Directors is now being more strongly tested due to economic conditions and the accountability for performance must be given to the shareholders whose capital has been entrusted in the form of share investments.

A study by researchers at Harvard Business School and the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School titled “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices” (Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 2003), looked at the relationship between corporate governance practices (including classified boards) and firm performance. The study found a significant positive link between governance practices favoring shareholders (such as annual directors election) and firm value.

While management may argue that directors need and deserve continuity, management should become aware that continuity and tenure may be best assured when their performance as directors is exemplary and is deemed beneficial to the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders.

The proponent regards as unfounded the concern expressed by some that annual election of all directors could leave companies without experienced directors in the event that all incumbents are voted out by shareholders. In the unlikely event that shareholders do vote to replace all directors, such a decision would express dissatisfaction with the incumbent directors and reflect the need for change.

~~If you agree that shareholders may benefit from greater accountability afforded by annual election of~~ ~~all~~ ~~directors, please vote “FOR” this proposal.~~

~~The Board of Directors~~approved an amendment to Article 3, Authorized Stock, of the ~~Corporation unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” this proposal.~~

·	~~A classified board provides for strategic continuity and stability and can preserve shareholder value in the event of an attempted corporate takeover.~~

·	~~There are a variety of other protections in place or available to shareholders that ensure the accountability of directors, even if they are elected on a classified basis.~~

The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders approve the proposed amendment because it considers such amendment to be in the best long-term and short-term interests of the ~~Corporation, except~~Company and its shareholders. The proposed increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock and preferred stock will ensure that ~~such 80% vote shall not~~a sufficient number of shares will be ~~required~~available, if ~~such amendment is unanimously recommended to the shareholders~~needed, for issuance in connection with any possible future transactions approved by the Board of ~~Directors.~~

The Company continually explores strategic alternatives to strengthen the Company’s capital position and enhance long-term shareholder value, ~~and is in~~but does not currently have any agreements, arrangements, commitments or understandings with respect to the ~~best interests~~issuance of any additional shares of the Corporation and its shareholders. A classified board also helps the Corporation attract and retain highly qualified individuals willing to dedicate the time and effort necessary to understand the Corporation, its operations and competitive environment, and concentrate on long-term planning and appropriate use of financial and other resources.

~~Moreover, a classified board helps to protect shareholder value in the face of a coercive takeover attempt. Absent a classified board, a potential acquirer could gain control~~Company’s common stock or preferred stock that would be authorized upon approval of the ~~Corporation by replacing~~proposed amendment. However, as described below, the Company has a ~~majority~~relatively low number of authorized but unissued shares that are not already reserved for issuance, and if the ~~Board with its own slate of nominees at a single annual meeting by a simple plurality of~~proposed amendment is not approved, the ~~votes cast. In contrast, the presence of a classified board, as well as other protections, encourage hostile shareholders who may seek~~Company’s flexibility to ~~acquire control of the Corporation to initiate arm’s-length discussions with the Board, who~~pursue potential future transactions involving common stock or preferred stock may be ~~in a position~~limited.

Under the Articles of Incorporation, the Company currently has authority to ~~negotiate a higher price~~issue 10,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $1 per share, of which 6,123,275 shares were issued and outstanding as of April 2, 2010. Thus, 3,876,725 shares were authorized, but unissued on that date. There are no preemptive rights with respect to the Company’s common stock. In addition, there are 441,000 shares reserved for issuance pursuant to stock options outstanding as of April 2, 2010.

Under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, the Company currently has authority to issue 200,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $5 per share, of which no shares are issued or ~~more favorable terms for shareholders or to seek to prevent a takeover that the Board believes is not in the best interest~~outstanding as of shareholders. The fact that the entire Board could not be removed in a single proxy fight would allow directors to weigh remaining independent against accepting the offer, or a competing offer, from a position of strength. Moreover, in considering any takeover effort or other significant development concerning the Corporation, the Board understands that its duty is to protect the interests of all the Corporation’s shareholders. The Board intends to discharge that duty to its utmost ability. The majority of the Board members are independent, non-management directors whose interests are aligned with the shareholders.

The proponent references a study finding a significant positive link between corporate governance practices (including classified boards) and firm value. A more recent report, however, reaches a different conclusion:

~~In closing, we note~~Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the ~~research~~proposed amendment to ~~date has done little to empirically evaluate~~ the ~~potential shareholder benefits associated with classified board provisions or establish the causal nature~~Company’s Articles of the relation between board classification and firm value. In this light we suggest a more circumspect policy approach be adopted by some governance practitioners and academics whose recent calls for the abolition of this common governance provision seem unwarranted and potentially damaging for shareholders. ~~(1)~~Incorporation.

~~(1)~~

~~Bates, Becher and Lemmon, Board Classification and Managerial Entrenchment: Evidence from the Market for Corporate Control (September 2007), at page 31.~~

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “AGAINST” THIS PROPOSAL FOR THE REASONS DESCRIBED ABOVE. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE VOTED “AGAINST” THIS PROPOSAL UNLESS A SHAREHOLDER HAS INDICATED OTHERWISE IN VOTING THE PROXY.

The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Conduct, which applies to all directors and employees of the ~~Corporation~~Company and the Bank. A portion of the Code of Conduct has special provisions for senior financial officers of the ~~Corporation~~Company and the Bank, which apply to the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as well as, the Bank’s Controller or person performing similar functions for the ~~Corporation~~Company and/or the Bank. The Code of Conduct for senior financial officers meets the requirements of a “code of ethics” as defined by Item 406 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K. The Code of Conduct is available on the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s website, ~~www.amnb.com.~~www.amnb.com. Select the ~~“American~~R 20;American National Bankshares Investor Relations” icon, and then select “Governance Documents.” The Code of Conduct is reviewed and reaffirmed on an annual basis by the Board, executive officers, and all other employees.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

SEPARATE COPIES FOR BENEFICIAL OWNERS

SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS AND PROPOSALS

Shareholders interested in communicating directly with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which is charged with handling all such communication to non-management members of the Board of Directors of the ~~Corporation,~~Company, may send correspondence to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, P.O. Box 191, Danville, Virginia 24543.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has approved a process for handling correspondence received by the ~~Corporation~~Company and addressed to non-management members of the Board. Under the process, the Assistant Secretary of the ~~Corporation~~Company will forward all mail specifically addressed to a member of the Board of Directors. If correspondence is specifically addressed only to a committee, the Assistant Secretary of the ~~Corporation~~Company will forward the mail to the Chairman of said committee. If any mail is received that is addressed only to “Board of Directors,” or “Non-Management Member of the Board of Directors,” said mail will be forwarded by the Assistant Secretary of the ~~Corporation~~Company to the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Correspondence relating to ~~accounting,~~accoun ting, internal controls or auditing matters are brought to the attention of the Chairman of the Audit and Compliance Committee.

To be considered for inclusion in the ~~Corporation’s~~Company’s proxy statement relating to the ~~2010~~2011 Annual Meeting, shareholder proposals, including recommendations for director nominees, must be received by the ~~Corporation~~Company at its principal office in Danville, Virginia, no later than December ~~16, 2009.~~13, 2010.

reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (ii) the name, record address of, and number of shares beneficially owned by the shareholder proposing such business, and (iii) any material interest of the shareholder in such business.

REFERENCES TO OUR WEBSITE ADDRESS

References to the Company’s website address throughout this proxy statement and the accompanying materials are for informational purposes only, or to fulfill specific disclosure requirements of the SEC rules or that of NASDAQ. These references are not intended to, and do not, incorporate the contents of the Company’s website by reference into this proxy statement or the accompanying materials.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 18, 2010

A complete set of proxy materials relating to the Company’s Annual Meeting is available on the Internet. These materials, consisting of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the proxy statement, including the proxy card, and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, may by viewed on the Company’s website at www.amnb.com.

The Company is providing shareholders with a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, including financial statements (but not including exhibits), free of charge, with this proxy statement. Shareholders may obtain copies of exhibits to the Form 10-K by making a written request to William W. Traynham, Chief Financial Officer, American National Bankshares Inc., Post Office Box 191, Danville, Virginia, 24543. The Company will charge $0.20 per page for copies of the exhibits. Shareholder’s may also download copies of the Form 10-K and exhibits from the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

The Audit and Compliance Committee Report shall not be deemed to be filed with the SEC, nor deemed incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s prior or future filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporate such information by reference.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Chief Executive Officer

April ~~15, 2009~~12, 2010

This Proxy Is Solicited On Behalf Of The Board Of Directors

American National Bankshares Inc.

Danville, Virginia 24541

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May ~~19, 2009,~~18, 2010, 9:00 A.M.

The undersigned hereby appoints ~~FRED A. BLAIR,~~BEN J. DAVENPORT, JR., H. DAN DAVIS, or ~~CLAUDE B. OWEN, JR.,~~CHARLES S. HARRIS, any of whom may act, as my attorney(s), with full power of substitution, to vote all the Common Stock of the ~~Corporation,~~Company, standing in my name on its books at the close of business on April ~~3, 2009,~~2, 2010, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May ~~19, 2009,~~18, 2010, or any adjournment thereof, with all the powers the undersigned would possess if personally present, as instructed below.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed in Proposals 1, 2 and ~~3 and a vote~~ ~~AGAINST~~FOR the Amendment in Proposal 4.3.

1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OF CLASS III TO SERVE UNTIL THE ~~2012~~2013 ANNUAL MEETING

_____ FOR all nominees listed _____WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FROM

below (except as marked a vote for all nominees

to the contrary below) listed below

~~BEN J. DAVENPORT,~~

~~MICHAEL P. HALEY~~

~~CHARLES S. HARRIS~~

~~FRANKLIN W. MADDUX~~ CLAUDE B. OWEN, JR.

(INSTRUCTION: TO WITHHOLD AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL NOMINEE, STRIKE A LINE THROUGH THE NOMINEE'S NAME IN THE ABOVE LIST.)

2. ELECTION OF DIRECTOR OF CLASS ~~II TO SERVE UNTIL THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING~~

~~_____ FOR the nominee listed _____WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FROM~~

below a vote for the nominee

~~60; listed below~~

~~E. BUDGE KENT, JR.~~

~~3. ELECTION OF DIRECTOR OF CLASS~~ III TO SERVE UNTIL THE 2011 ANNUAL MEETING

_____ FOR the nominee listed _____WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FROM

below a vote for the nominee

& #160; listed below

~~MARTHA W. MEDLEY~~

3. To amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase:

(a) the number of authorized shares of the $1 par value common stock from 10,000,000 to 20,000,000; and

(b) the number of authorized shares of the $5 par value preferred stock from 200,000 to 2,000,000.

4. ~~SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING DECLASSIFICATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS~~

~~_____FOR _____AGAINST _____ABSTAIN~~

5. Any other business which may properly be brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

The Common Stock represented by this Proxy will be voted as specified; however, as to any matter where no choice is specified, the Proxy will be voted FOR all the nominees listed in Proposals 1, 2 and ~~3 and~~ ~~AGAINST~~FOR the Amendment in Proposal 4.3.

ALL SHAREHOLDERS LISTED ON THIS PROXY SHOULD SIGN THE BACK OF THIS PAGE.

~~-------------AFTER~~

--------AFTER SIGNING, PLEASE FOLD HERE AND RETURN IN THE ENVELOPE ~~PROVIDED-----------~~

If any other business is presented at said meeting, this Proxy shall be voted in accordance with the recommendations of management. This Proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted. The undersigned may attend the Annual Meeting, revoke this Proxy and vote in person.

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Charles H. Majors President and Chief Executive Officer	2008	361,846	19,900	0	82,631	21,007	485,384
of the Corporation and the Bank	2007	347,308	0	23,016	61,224	19,129	450,677
(Principal Executive Officer)	2006	313,846	0	47,313	49,862	24,416	435,437

Neal A. Petrovich * Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,	2008	145,152	5,970	0	8,497	10,982	170,601
Treasurer, and Secretary of the Corporation;	2007	139,200	0	9,225	6,638	10,432	165,495
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank (Principal Financial Officer)	2006	129,462	0	19,492	6,392	10,603	165,949

Jeffrey V. Haley Senior Vice President of the Corporation;	2008	156,318	5,970	0	19,728	11,208	193,224
Executive Vice President and President of Trust	2007	149,908	0	9,935	14,381	10,926	185,150
and Financial Services of the Bank	2006	139,231	0	20,761	13,303	11,073	184,368

R. Helm Dobbins Senior Vice President of the Corporation;	2008	139,570	5,970	0	21,100	8,012	174,652
Executive Vice President and Chief	2007	133,847	0	8,870	13,099	7,909	163,725
Credit Officer of the Bank	2006	124,501	0	19,040	13,451	10,371	167,363

S. Cabell Dudley, Jr. Senior Vice President of the Corporation;	2008	127,056	5,970	0	20,779	12,211	166,016
Executive Vice President and Chief	2007**
Lending Officer of the Bank	2006**				��

Dabney T.P. Gilliam, Jr. Senior Vice President of the Corporation;	2008	124,544	5,970	0	12,329	10,155	152,998
Executive Vice President and Chief	2007**
Administrative Officer of the Bank	2006**

* Mr. Petrovich resigned from the Corporation in February 2009.
** Mr. Dudley and Mr. Gilliam were named Executive Officers in December 2008.

	2008		2007		2009	2008
Audit Fees	$	130,850	$	121,300	$ 132,595	$ 130,850
Audit-related Fees		0		0	1,180	-
Tax Fees		9,000		9,550	8,650	9,000
All Other Fees		0		0	-	-
Total	$	139,250	$	130,850	$ 142,425	$ 139,850

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12